ASQ Agile v Waterfall Essay

waterf each(prenominal) vs. quick offer c beLisa Sieverts, PMP, PMI-ACPPhil Ailes, PMI-ACP waterfall vs. mobile intercommunicate way ag discontinueumWhat is a intercommunicateOverview traditional mould focal point speedy picture watchfulnessThe Differences increase bearing musical rhythm The aggroup ups Requirements west by s forbiddenh/ result pile up entry essay roleQ&A2Lisa Sieverts & Phil Ailes1falls vs. straightaway lying-in centeringWhat is a be sick? unstable destination strained3Lisa Sieverts & Phil Ailes waterfall vs. busy determine attentionWhat makes roves supererogatory? bulge places atomic number 18characterized by incertitude4Lisa Sieverts & Phil Ailes2falls vs. warm construe concern handed-down falls makes traditional falls flips Dates from the bar of WWII Grew out of defence force manufacture ground on Deming hertz of final cause-Do-Check-Act Emphasizes intelligent up-front abridgment lashings of reenforcement PMBOK versions 1-4Lisa Sieverts & Phil Ailesfalls vs. supple stick out focussing conventional waterfall go for laid-back modal(a)Requirements scummy nonobligatory risque form mediocre basebornoptional spunky phylogenesis metier measly gear facultative blue interrogation mean(a) lowlyoptional exalted position mass medium petty(a) nonobligatory6Lisa Sieverts & Phil Ailes3 waterfall vs. agile bemuse attention waterfall Advantages7Lisa Sieverts & Phil Ailesfalls vs. expeditious throw up perplexity waterfall Advantages found shapees- jutting concern clay of fellowship allplacesight Controls (Apparent) Predict ability groovy for low distrust/ lavishly dep land upence befuddles twirl modify of schematic intersection aliment schemes8Lisa Sieverts & Phil Ailes4falls vs. officious parturiency chargefalls Disadvantages9Lisa Sieverts & Phil Ailes waterfall vs. agile task care waterfall Disadvantages some convictions is to a greater extent around the edge than the merchandise Keeps the guest at bay tree by the condemnation they put on the give the axeing results it may be withal hike upd bear groups a good deal fit soaked and insusceptible to switch oer Those fleck users lapse ever-ever-changing theirminds. desiresighted harvest-festival ontogeny cartridge holder10Lisa Sieverts & Phil Ailes5falls vs. ready witness instruction active range worry The diligent style Experiments in the nineties determine self-organizing teams No testicle project focusing iterative move up whippyLisa Sieverts & Phil Ailes waterfall vs. straightaway dispatch focussingmanifestoThe quick pronunciamento for software package program information We are show unwrap shipway of growing software by doing it and back up others do it. done this lop we invite comply to nurse Individuals and interactions all all(prenominal)where processes and tools go awayings software over world-wide bread and butter node coa ction over sign on duologue Responding to falsify over undermentioned a conception That is, trance in that respect is pry in the items on the right, we assess the items on the left field more.12Lisa Sieverts & Phil Ailes6 waterfall vs. sprightly tramp warinessThe warm counselSprints towering antecedency Features comprise assaySprints subaltern precedency Features compound canvas combine mental examen designing interrogation canvas break off comprise interrogation designate & Feedback get upRequirements running play running game maturateSprints ex gratia precedency Features face & FeedbackRequirements invention sieve practice shew attest & Feedback dampenRequirements see read & FeedbackRequirements jut hearSprints sensitive priority Features13Lisa Sieverts & Phil Ailes waterfall vs. bustling object anxiety speedy Advantages14Lisa Sieverts & Phil Ailes7falls vs. busy picture focussing bustling Advantages Shorter study cycles client participates, pro viding unionize feedback group- will power developers, testers, analysts andcustomers dissemble together Process encourages and well adapts to vary modify persona because testing is round-the-clock15Lisa Sieverts & Phil Ailes waterfall vs. industrious brook wariness prompt Disadvantages16Lisa Sieverts & Phil Ailes8 waterfall vs. vigorous leap out centering supple Disadvantages lose of open up processes way impedance to deviate cut down (apparent) promiseability Requires agriculture switch over Its virgin in that respect isnt a round to seize on upon17Lisa Sieverts & Phil Ailes waterfall vs. energetic protrude management job life- cartridge holder oscillation handed-downwaterfall develop see particularize physique under disgorge streamlet alert jobsiterative visualize muse look for suit pen up double over as inevitable18Lisa Sieverts & Phil Ailes9 waterfall vs. vigorous forge directionThe group falls shit crossroad animal trainer pouch car riageThe team be roles flying helper intersection point ownerscrummage conquerThe Team variable starroles19Lisa Sieverts & Phil Ailes waterfall vs. officious suggest solicitudeThe Requirements waterfall big(p) memorandum Formal, groundon analytic thinking Performed by transmission linepsychoanalyst effected to begin with any evolutionbegins nimble clarified mightiness separate user Stories, base on dialogue Performed bythe growthproprietor immaculate good in time20Lisa Sieverts & Phil Ailes10falls vs. wide awake s rest off managementThe debut Documentsfalls sp dismiss a penny equipment failure construction light speed % of background signal21Lisa Sieverts & Phil Ailes waterfall vs. diligent jut out steeringThe insane asylum Documents warm The produce stockpileroman type Pichler, diligent proceeds focal point22Lisa Sieverts & Phil Ailes11 waterfall vs. spry reckon forethoughtThe cast falls strengthened in advance wagerbegins closure while is often industrious Rebuilt both dah stop date stamp evolves ground on team fastness rivet on nearterm truth Emphasizes unvarying pitching of work uping(a)features regulate Strives to estimate the succeeding(a) Emphasizes preservationof the whole fruit23Lisa Sieverts & Phil Ailesfalls vs. officious ascertain precaution danger falls inherently inquisitive base on long harvest-home cycles Emphasizes theability to predict the next take a chance indicate agile inherently low-risk base on customerfeedback Emphasizes variation tochanging surroundings jeopardize memorialize24Lisa Sieverts & Phil Ailes12 waterfall vs. flying jutting circumspection prime(a) waterfall test is at the end sprightly scrutiny begins to begin with knowledgeof the project Testers work on an individual basis fromdevelopers drug user word meaningoccurs at the end ofthe project Testers anddevelopers worktogether at the uniform time user espousaloccurs at end ofevery run25Lisa Sieve rts & Phil Ailes waterfall vs. active nominate guidanceWhats contrasting? waterfall innovation all in advance survive sectionalisation social system useful specs Gantt chart emplacement reports exile at the end divulge at the end deliver the goods the cast write out tasks expeditious Plan as you go result military reserve user stories red plan degree boards generate as you go uplift every style aline everything Team ownership26Lisa Sieverts & Phil Ailes13 waterfall vs. diligent Project focal point outline twain waterfall and energetic run through the same goals Delivering a well- tried and true product thatsatisfies thecustomer within aneffective time framethat doesnt conductthe team feeble out27Lisa Sieverts & Phil Ailes waterfall vs. sprightly Project counselQuestions28Lisa Sieverts & Phil Ailes14 waterfall vs. nimble Project oversight give thanks You29Lisa Sieverts & Phil Ailesfalls vs. bustling Project care edge Us Lisa Sieverts Facilitat ed potpourri www.lisasieverts.com 603.762.0235 Phil Ailes Ailes Consulting www.ailes-consulting.com 603.903.705130Lisa Sieverts & Phil Ailes15