Should the 'crimes' of the 'law-abiding majority' be criminalised more Essay

Should the offences of the law-abiding majority be criminalised more frequently - Essay ExampleThis means that the legal locating of a doings whether defined as a crime or not is in not in the content of the behavior itself, but lies in the social response to the behavior in school principal and the changes in the legal status of the behavior can be brought about by the transitions in the society. It should similarly be noted that the social response to crime including numerous explanations for crime argon based not only on the nature of the act itself but also on the moral and social stand of the offender as related to that of the victim. Further, it is noted that in the absence of every ontological reality of crime, in that location atomic number 18 tests that are used in the construction of crime, one of which is the test of intention to blame the crime cognise as Mens rea (Hillyard 2005a, p.9). There is an area of criminal activity that occurs in the current society that take crimes and unfair practices that are committed in the society and are usually committed by nation who see themselves as law abiding and who would readily reject the label of being criminals (Karstedt & Farrall 2007, p.7). They are known as the law-abiding majority but they fail to understand that just about people do not choose to abide by the law but are forced to abide by its render or are selective in their compliance with the law. It is important to note from the onset that though the behavior under discussion may be unscrupulous or unfair, it appears normal in the eyes of most offenders who try to justify it. The offences by the law abiding majority are that the middle class commit the offences or ill practices but are also eager to blame the perpetrators when they find out that they are the victims of such behavior. Research has shown that the law-abiding majority may bend more rules than what is in the public state (Karstedt and Farrall 2006, p.1039). The crimes by the law abiding citizens though may be crimes of everyday life, they may not be regarded as antisocial per se but could be termed as anti-civil as they show the absence of politeness among the citizens who should show the opposite character (Green, Grove and Martin 2005, p. 233). Not all behaviors are usually considered as ill-gotten in general but some are deemed morally dubious by both victims and the offenders and are not unusual or outstanding in nature but are mundane. Whether s.5 Public station Act 1986 offences is more likely to be prosecuted than Health and Safety offences committed in the workplace percentage 5 of the United Kingdom the Public Order Act 1986 was expounded in the recent case of Harvey v DPP 2011 All ER (D) 143 which gave the threshold of the offences under this provision. The case gave what should be used in the determination of the occurrence whether words used are abusive as interpreted against scratch 5 of the act and when certainty of their impact on an individual can be required by the court (Brown & Ellis 1994, pp.1-4). Under section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986, an offence can only be deemed so if it possesses twain elements and include the fact that a person must have made use of intimidating, insulting or offensive words or behavior. Further, the behavior must have been disorderly or have displayed any writing, sign or a visible representation that will be